Ultrasound Tech Pay

San Francisco vs Santa Monica: Ultrasound Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare ultrasound technologist salaries between San Francisco, CA and Santa Monica, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$168,171
$80.85/hr
Santa Monica, CA
$138,093
$66.39/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CASanta Monica, CA
Median Salary$168,171$138,093
Hourly Rate$80.85$66.39
Entry Level (P10)$99,264$96,422
25th Percentile$129,463$113,657
75th Percentile$190,123$150,987
Top Earner (P90)$214,204$180,263
Total Employed1,30020
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($168,171) and Santa Monica ($138,093) ultrasound technologist salaries.San FranciscoSanta MonicaMedian Salary$168,171$138,093Entry Level (P10)$99,264$96,422Top Earner (P90)$214,204$180,263US Median $101,352

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for ultrasound technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Santa Monica.

The salary gap between San Francisco and Santa Monica is $30,078 (21.78%). San Francisco's median is +65.93% compared to the US national median of $101,352.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $114,940,Santa Monica spans $83,841. San Francisco has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$99,264
P25$129,463
Median$168,171
P75$190,123
P90 (Top)$214,204
Santa Monica
P10 (Entry)$96,422
P25$113,657
Median$138,093
P75$150,987
P90 (Top)$180,263

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($145,460 effective) pays 19.13% more than Santa Monica ($122,098 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $168,171
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $145,460
Santa Monica
Nominal: $138,093
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $122,098

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($168,171/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($214,204)
  • Larger job market (1,300 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $145,460)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Santa Monica if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, ultrasound technologist salaries in San Francisco grew 39.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to -7.2% growth in Santa Monica over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+39.6%

$114,790 (2019) → $160,270 (2025)

Santa Monica, CA

+-7.2%

$141,746 (2024) → $131,605 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays ultrasound technologists more: San Francisco or Santa Monica?

San Francisco has a higher median ultrasound technologist salary at $168,171/year, compared to Santa Monica at $138,093/year — a difference of $30,078 (21.78%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and Santa Monica?

San Francisco ultrasound technologists earn $80.85/hr while Santa Monica hygienists earn $66.39/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to Santa Monica as a ultrasound technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and Santa Monica. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $145,460, Santa Monica = $122,098), job availability (1,300 vs 20 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level ultrasound technologists earn in San Francisco vs Santa Monica?

Entry-level (10th percentile) ultrasound technologists earn $99,264 in San Francisco and $96,422 in Santa Monica. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

RP

Written by Ravi Patel, RDMS, RVT

Career Analyst

Ravi has 10 years of experience as an ultrasound technologist. He specializes in abdominal and pelvic imaging. He works in a community hospital.

Clinically reviewed by Maria Gonzalez, RDMS, RTData verified by James Kim, RDCS, RVT

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 4.93% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Ravi Patel, RDMS, RVT, a licensed ultrasound technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov