Ultrasound Tech Pay

Richmond vs San Francisco: Ultrasound Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare ultrasound technologist salaries between Richmond, CA and San Francisco, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Richmond, CA
$139,216
$66.93/hr
San Francisco, CA
$168,171
$80.85/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRichmond, CASan Francisco, CA
Median Salary$139,216$168,171
Hourly Rate$66.93$80.85
Entry Level (P10)$92,243$99,264
25th Percentile$111,455$129,463
75th Percentile$154,661$190,123
Top Earner (P90)$187,476$214,204
Total Employed251,300
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Richmond ($139,216) and San Francisco ($168,171) ultrasound technologist salaries.RichmondSan FranciscoMedian Salary$139,216$168,171Entry Level (P10)$92,243$99,264Top Earner (P90)$187,476$214,204US Median $101,352

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for ultrasound technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Richmond.

The salary gap between Richmond and San Francisco is $28,955 (20.80%). San Francisco's median is +65.93% compared to the US national median of $101,352.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Richmond spans $95,233,San Francisco spans $114,940. San Francisco has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced ultrasound technologists.

Richmond
P10 (Entry)$92,243
P25$111,455
Median$139,216
P75$154,661
P90 (Top)$187,476
San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$99,264
P25$129,463
Median$168,171
P75$190,123
P90 (Top)$214,204

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($145,460 effective) pays 18.17% more than Richmond ($123,091 effective).

Richmond
Nominal: $139,216
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $123,091
San Francisco
Nominal: $168,171
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $145,460

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Richmond if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($168,171/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($214,204)
  • Larger job market (1,300 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $145,460)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, ultrasound technologist salaries in Richmond grew -7.2% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 39.6% growth in San Francisco over the same period.

Richmond, CA

+-7.2%

$142,899 (2024) → $132,675 (2025)

San Francisco, CA

+39.6%

$114,790 (2019) → $160,270 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays ultrasound technologists more: Richmond or San Francisco?

San Francisco has a higher median ultrasound technologist salary at $168,171/year, compared to Richmond at $139,216/year — a difference of $28,955 (20.80%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Richmond and San Francisco?

Richmond ultrasound technologists earn $66.93/hr while San Francisco hygienists earn $80.85/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Richmond to San Francisco as a ultrasound technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Richmond and San Francisco. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Richmond = $123,091, San Francisco = $145,460), job availability (25 vs 1,300 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level ultrasound technologists earn in Richmond vs San Francisco?

Entry-level (10th percentile) ultrasound technologists earn $92,243 in Richmond and $99,264 in San Francisco. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

RP

Written by Ravi Patel, RDMS, RVT

Career Analyst

Ravi has 10 years of experience as an ultrasound technologist. He specializes in abdominal and pelvic imaging. He works in a community hospital.

Clinically reviewed by Maria Gonzalez, RDMS, RTData verified by James Kim, RDCS, RVT

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 4.93% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Ravi Patel, RDMS, RVT, a licensed ultrasound technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov